Despairing Self is taking an indefinite leave of absence. This blog I feel has for now served its purpose and it is time to move on, although I don’t know where to since my visual practice seems to be in transit. Some of this content and new content can be found here.
Kierkegaard’s
Despairing Self [existentially over and out]
New Years Resolution from Kierkegaard: Face the facts of being what you are, for that is what changes what you are.
‘Through contemporary artists’ practice, this conference examines the role and influence of the peripheral and the marginal on art production and the framework in which it’s received. Speakers include writer, lecturer and researcher Maeve Connolly, writer Brian Dillon [see Ruins, MIT press, In the Dark Room 2005], Sean Dockray, artist, writer, curator Richard Grayson, Caleb Kelly and Jennifer Thatcher.’ Ref: Whitechapel Art Gallery
Marginalia fall under the wider category of ancient practice of scholia; extra notes, scribbles and comments made by readers in the margin of a book. Categories of marginalia include Emendation (correction), Transcription, Glosses or Annotation – the formal method of embellishing a literary work with critical commentary i.e to gloss a text, Rubrics (like Scholia & glosses these are ‘structural marginalia’, meant to be read), Footnotes & Citation, references Dead Media Archive. They represent the active negotiation of a text by a Reader, the meaning lying somewhere between the producer and the receiver in ‘the margin of understanding’. (I have appropriated this term from the Cultural Theorist Stuart Hall, a leading exponent of Reception theory). Stanley Fish, key theorist of Reader Response theory emphasised, among other things, the transaction between the control of the reader by the text and how the reader re/creates a text. This marginal space lies somewhere between the public & the private and can be regarded as a social phenomenon. Marginalia exist both as the conception of serious works in their own right or preparatory drafts for major works including Voltaire’s marginalia on Rousseau, Edgar Allen Poe’s ‘fragmentary manuscript material’ entitled Marginalia 1845 – 1948 volumes of marginalia by Samuel Taylor Coleridge. Alsdo relevant, although it constitutes more of a critical commentary, is the famous edit of T.S Eliot’s The Wasteland by Ezra Pound which currently forms part of my research on fragmentary writing, artifice and in/direct quotation/citation. For further rumination on the idea of waste in art please visit http://narratingwaste.wordpress.com/2011/03/31/t-s-eliot-and-the-writing-of-waste/.
For all those interested in ancillary operations and the codex please also refer to the narratologist’s Gerard Gennette [Palimpsests, The Work of Art, Intertextuality] Paratexts – Thresholds of Interpretation including Titles, Prefaces, Intertitles, Epigraphs [which is also a form relevant to the fragmentary a la Derrida] etc. This ‘encyclopeadic survey’ analyses their ‘illocutionary force’ [inside cover]. In that respect all of these activities amount to a performativity within/on/to the text. For a contemporary example see Nick Thurston’s Reading the Remove of Literature, and his marginalia within The Space of Literature by Maurice Blanchot, whose work had a profound influence on Post Structuralist theory.
Image reproduced from http://radar.oreilly.com/2011/02/marginalia-ebooks-digital.html
STILL LIFE – Intention or the lack of it

DS would like to apologise for any perceived lack of activity of late. This is due to the fact that DS is currently busily engaged in Research and Reading for their post graduate dissertation. This is currently based around the concept of the Fragment/ary including:
a] its inception in the pre-socratic philosophers [Heraclitus]
b] its becoming genre in the philosophical poetics [a contradiction in terms] of German Romanticism [Schlegel, Novalis after Kant, Fichte, Schleiermacher] and the unification of literature as criticism, criticism as literature [taken up by modernist poets such as Mallarme]
c] its development and concrete formulation in the Denkbild of the Frankfurt School including Walter Benjamin [The Arcades Project, One Way Street] Adorno [Minima Moralia] as well as key post-structuralist figures including Blanchot [The Writing of the Disaster] and Barthes [A Lovers Discourse].
d] its extension into poetry and literature [proper?] including Samuel Beckett and T.S Eliot [The Wasteland] to name just a few.
e] I am seeking to establish the impact of the form and its manifestation in contemporary poetics, performance writing, conceptual art writing and constrained algorithmic writing techniques such as Oulipo. In short writing the fragment/ary is in and of itself writing as affect that seeks to establish its own ground transposing objects and phenomena [philosophical, literary, political cultural] into a new aesthetic space that is perpetually in media res .
The form of the fragment encompasses a range of interrelationships including the part/whole, being/becoming, finite/infinite, philosophy/poetics, system/anti-system manifesting in the incomplete, the unfinished, the ruin, the circular, the negative, the space between not/knowing and is characterised by the cut, montage, edit, discontinuity, iterability, heterogeneity, hyper-text, incorporation, multiplicity, seriality. Fragment/ary writing often seeks to explore the intermedial relationships between word, image, voice, gaze, look, the other by way of the anecdotal, enigmatic, speculative, hypothetical, the imaginary and above all the contingent.Phew!
In order to keep track of this process DS is constructing a new blog specifically for this purpose rather than confuse this blog or present readers with research that they may not be interested in. If you are interested in following this process or have anything to contribute to this research click here. Please bear with me much of this territory is new and I am a subject in process [after Kristeva] who is rapidly becoming discombobulated and something of a fragmentalist. Since I started this process they seem to be multiplying which is adding to my predeliction to detail and all things marginal including paratexts, footnotes, marginalia and annotation. As Donkey said in Shrek – ‘look at my eye twitching, I’m gonna need a whole lot of therapy when this is over’. I may need to check myself into rehab to be defragmented.
Image/text reproduced from http://mocoloco.com/archives/001985.php
Work in ten parts. Each part is constituted of a black and white full-page litho offset picture, with text in the lower margin; and one page, text printed black.
“A work of 1973, VI, furnishes another variant of text and image combinations. Here, the same photograph is repeated in tandem with a changing narrative and, in this case, includes socially pointed subject matter. Appropriated from a British mail order catalogue, the photograph presents the image of a happy, nuclear British family. Large-type captions, composed by the artist, deal directly with dominant social values and beliefs in order to suggest links between photographic and verbal content. The first, for example, maintains ‘Any physical object is to be positively valued only if it may be instrumental in the achievement of a goal’ and the last, ‘Precipitance in the achievement of goals is to be positively valued.’ Likewise, the remaining captions comment abstractly on the positive value of goals. They are interpretatively linked to the photograph by expectations incurred in relation to their proximate positioning beneath the image. Another, separate group of texts written by Burgin in the theoretical language of structuralism, runs concurrently through the work in counterbalance to the consumerist values embedded in and evoked by text and image. The work in this way, lays bare the methods employed in its construction rather than cloaking them in the manipulative terms of advertising. At the same time, it proffers such methods to decode the proselytizing texts and images rampant in modern society.”
Anne Rorimer, in “New Art in the 60s and 70s. Redefining Reality”, 2001.
The ten text leaves:
I
A complex of phenomena so integrated as to to be seen as unit with properties not derivable from the parts of that unit in summation; a sector of a given perceptual field identified, at a given moment, as a whole and as having attributes more extensive than the sum of the attributes of it constituent elements; a gestalt
II
1. A gestalt serving to direct the attention with respect to some thing other than that gestalt; a signifier
2.1. A signifier which is to some degree isomorphic with its referent, one which is motivated
2.2. A signifier whose referent is construed from a knowledge of arbitrary conventions governing the use of that signifier and only from that knowledge, one which is unmotivated
III
1. A corpus of signifiers and of rules governing their combinations, in common use within a society for the interpersonal communication of commonly accessible meanings; a totality of signifying elements and relations; a code
2. A corpus of signifiers and of rules governing their combination, abstracted from a code, employed within a society for the interpersonal communication of meanings additional to those construed in strict conformity to the established code; a sub-code
IV
An assembly of signifiers drawn from and structured according to a code; a message
V
1. That signified by a message which in accord with a code may be identified by both sender and receiver as constituing the explicit, manifest, content of that message; that which remains invariant in translation; that which, in accord with III 1, is denoted by IV
2. That signified by a message which in accord with a sub-code may be identified by some senders and some receivers as constituing an implicit, latent, content of that message; that which, in accord with III 2, is connoted by IV
VI
1. The juxtaposition of a visual image and a supplementary linguistic message, this latter indicating prefered meanings from amongst the connoted meanings of the former; anchorage
2. The juxtaposition of a visual image and a complementary linguistic message indicating a meaning not signified by either of the component messages; relay
VII
A complex of propositions concerning constituents of the natural and social world, and the relations between these constituents, generally accepted in a given society as describing the actual and necessary nature of things; taken-for-granted realities of everyday life; pre-given determinations of individual consciousness; that which is commonly held within a given society as a necessary frame of reference for the projection of individual actions; that which is considered necessarily, in the nature of things, to be the case; a world-view
VIII
1.1. The individual elements of which a world-view is composed; all things which are defined within a given society as discrete entities; cultural units
1.2. Those cultural units by which the worth of a thing or of an action is judged; conceptions ideally governing individual selections from alternative courses of action; standards by which the desirability of modes of behaviour and the goals towards which behaviour is directed are assessed; values
IX
Those assemblies of cultural units which, emphasising values, provide the context within which individual biographies and institutional orders may be legitimated; typifications of common-sense thinking which provide order for the subjective apprehension of biographical experience; contingent frames of reference for the projection of individual actions; systems of concepts which give individual experiences their meanings; ideologies
X
1. Complete congruence between the sub-codes of sender and receiver with a resultant decoding of a message in terms of the prefered meanings of the sender; interpretation of a message in the context of full concordance of ideologies
2. Partial congruence between the sub-codes of sender and receiver with a resultant decoding of a message in terms of an amalgamation of the prefered meanings of the sender with the prefered meanings of the receiver; interpretation of a message in the context of partial concordance of ideologies
3. Complete incongruence between the sub-codes of sender and receiver with a resultant decoding of a message in terms of the prefered meanings of the receiver to the exclusion of the prefered meanings of the sender; interpretation of a message in the context of discordance of ideologies
Text and image reproduced from http://archives.carre.pagesperso-orange.fr/Burgin%20Victor.html
Logout2?hl=en&service=mail&ilo=1&ils=wise%2Cwriterly%2C.
GB&ilc=0& continue=https%3A%2 %2Fwww.google.com%2
Faccounts%2FServiceLogin%3Fservice%3Dmail%26passive%3
Dtrue%26rm%3Dfalse%26continue%3Dhttps%253A%252F%252
Fmail.google.com%252Fmail%252F%253Fui%253Dhtml%2526zy%
253Dl%26bsv%3Dllya [My God is he] 694le36z%26ss%3
D1 694le36z%26ss%3D1 %3D2%26hl%3Den%26from%3
Dlogout&zx=292773619,
Search > Of minimal things, of mice and magic, of the human form, of time and city, of women and their elegance, off limits, off road, off the beaten track, off the deckle edge, off the planet, off the radar, of this tale I cannot guarantee a single word…